AnchorMark
Audit

Catch the obvious so reviewers can focus on the subtle.

Run an automated audit across SEO, social, accessibility, hygiene, and brand alignment. Claude compares the live page to your Content Brief, drafts pass/fail verdicts, and writes a one-paragraph executive summary for the QA cycle.

See pricing
Problem

Why this hurts today

Manual QA spends 80% of its time confirming the same hygiene checks — alt text, meta tags, broken assets, mismatched CTAs — and runs out of energy for the judgment calls that actually matter. Reviewers either skip the boring checks (and miss real regressions) or burn the budget on them and never get to brand or message review at all.

Solution

What AnchorMark does

AnchorMark runs the deterministic audits for you (titles, meta, OG, canonicals, mixed content, broken assets, alt text, form labels, headings) and adds AI verdicts on the subjective ones (CTA alignment, brand voice, headline match, ICP fit). Reviewers approve in bulk or override per-item. Failures always require a human, AI cost is capped per workspace, and every audit run is recorded for compliance review.

Capabilities

What you get when you turn this on.

SEO + social audit

Title, meta description, OG tags, Twitter cards, and canonicals.

Hygiene checks

HTTPS, mixed content, broken assets, favicon, viewport meta, and more.

Accessibility + markup

Alt text, form labels, heading hierarchy, and landmark structure.

Brief-aware AI verdicts

Claude compares headlines, CTAs, brand voice, and ICP fit against your Content Brief.

Bulk-accept verdicts

Reviewers approve every non-fail AI verdict in one click; failures stay in the manual queue.

Auto-summarized review

A 3–6 sentence executive summary describes posture (clean / minor / blockers) on transition to approval.

Cost guard

Per-workspace spend caps so a runaway audit can never produce a surprise invoice.

Audit history

Every run is stored with the brief snapshot, the page snapshot, and the verdict trail.

Frequently asked questions

Do I have to use the AI?
No. Deterministic audits run on their own; AI verdicts are opt-in per workspace. Many teams enable AI on marketing pages and keep it off on internal tools.
Are AI verdicts ever auto-applied?
Only when you explicitly bulk-accept. Failing verdicts always require a human review, and every accept/override is recorded in the audit log.
What does AnchorMark check beyond SEO?
Accessibility (alt text, form labels, heading hierarchy, contrast), hygiene (mixed content, broken assets, viewport meta), brand alignment against your Content Brief, and CTA destinations against expected URLs.
How accurate are the AI verdicts?
Brief-aware verdicts are scored against the brief you defined, not against generic best practices, so accuracy is largely a function of brief quality. Bulk-accept is gated on a human reviewer; AnchorMark never auto-approves a failing verdict.
Will my page content be used to train models?
No. AI calls go through the AnchorMark cost guard to providers on no-training data paths, and your content is not added to any model's training set.
Can I cap how much AI costs me each month?
Yes — per-org spend caps and request budgeting are built in. Usage and remaining budget are visible in the workspace settings.

Ship faster with feedback that already has the receipts.

Start a 14-day trial of the Team plan — no credit card required.

Compare plans